Archive for November, 2006

One of Those Weekends…

So, thi s weekend my system died while playing with a forensic imaging tool. I managed to write binary data directly to my hard drive, overwriting everything in the process. That thing should have come with a warning label. So, I’ve spent the past couple of days reinstalling Linux on my system. I decided to go with Suse 10.1 this time around. I used the internet installation - very handy.

At any rate, because of this, I haven’t been posting this weekend. Now that things are back to normal, we will now continue with your regular scheduled programming.

Cool Worldwide News Map Tool

If any of you out there are serious news junkies, I would suggest you take a look at MappedUp. MappedUp is a cool way of keeping track of the news across the world. It displays a world map, and displays the headlines from the news in each area of the world. It does this by keeping track of a huge number of RSS feeds from around the world.

You are also free to submit your own tagged feeds. While they will not show up on the large World Map, they will be available to users with accounts at MappedUp who chose to include them on their personal maps.

WorldMap is available both online, and downloadable as a screensaver, or desktop widget. Check it out!

Typo Squatter loses Thousands of Dollars Due to Missed Details

Update: the mystery is finally solved

Setting

This yesterday, I mistyped the URL as I was visiting Google this morning; I accidentally typed http://www.google.cm. This redirected me to a page on the domain of http://www.agoga.com, which actually looked like a somewhat convincing, spartan page, very similar in style to what you would often see if your browser. Except that it also contained a search bar, and a few unobtrusive links to subject like ‘Travel’, ‘Cars’ etc., the kind of subjects you would see on a typical parked domain page.

Google.cm

I thought that was kind of interesting, a way of monetizing typos that looked to me at least like it would be somewhat effective way of squatting a typo. At the time, though, it didn’t seem noteworthy enough to me to give it further thought.

A little later, I was trying to get to Paypal, and again I accidentally typed http://www.paypal.cm. Once again I was at the same page. I was intrigued, and began experimenting by checking a variety of other domains with the .cm extension. Many big names in the industry had the .cm TLD pointed to the same page I had viewed earlier.

That also, is not that notable. A squatter could easily have registered a whole variety of company names in that TLD - it’s done all the time, and is considered a valid tactic for making some money off of parked domains.

What made it notable finally is when I started entering random domains, and sequences of characters in the .cm TLD. such as http://sdfjhksd.cm and http://www.oiyt.cm. These also are pointing to a landing page on agoga.com, albeit a different landing page from the ones used on major domain mispellings.

Agoga.com has every unregistered .cm TLD pointed to their landing pages!

While there are a bunch of legitimately registered .cm sites which resolve elsewhere, any other .cm domain, whether nonsense characters or misspellings of ‘real’ domain names resolves to the same IP address which is a cluster at agoga.com. The only way this could be accomplished is to change the default site settings of the master DNS serving the .cm TLD. Agoga must have either hacked the .cm registrar in Cameroon, or paid the registrar off for this. Either way, I suspect something illegal has occurred here; I doubt this type of redirecting is approved by IANA.

Agoga Alexa Graph

Opportunity

How much type-in traffic would you think would be generated by people misspelling .com as .cm? Agoga.com has an Alexa Rank of 6,915 which indicates thousands or tens of thousands of visitors per day by some estimates. Keep in mind that this site has not been running for even three months yet; today’s Alexa rank was 2,913.

Since Alexa ranking is biased towards a technical crowd, I think it is safe to assume that the true numbers are fairly large. Now, it is easily attainable that a proper landing page optimized for Pay-Per-Click advertisements will result in a 30%-40% click-through-rate. Especially if one was to put some effort into ensuring the advertisements were targeted around the domain name or keywords at the similar .com page.

It is obvious that with this type of traffic, Agoga.com could be pulling in some huge advertising revenue - as much a $1000-$2000 per day. They should have it made in the shade, for all intents and purposes. But, they have screwed up royally.

How did they screw up?

Agoga will return you to one of two landing pages, depending on what type of domain you enter. One version, which they seem to use when squatting the domain of a large company or popular website, can be seen at http://www.google.cm. The other, which they seem to use for the domains of smaller websites and nonsense or misspelled domains can be seen at http://www.oeiurt.cm (note the random domain name…) or http://www.caydel.cm (a typo of this domain) or at the Agoga main page at http://www.agoga.com.

The first type of landing page is broken - The first type of landing page is relatively well done - it is minimal, and could easily get the user to click onto their main site. The problem lies in that no ads are served if the user enters certain search queries. While an advertising page is shown if the user enters a query such as ‘digital cameras’, ‘dvd’, ‘knitting’, other queries such as ‘infohatter’, ‘caydel’ or whatever return nothing. Sure, probably nobody is bidding on that term; wouldn’t it be a better plan to grab the first result from a Google query for that term, scrape it for keywords, and return ads based on that? Potentially millions of long-tail opportunities are being missed here, thrown away for no good reason.

The second type of landing page broken - The script that Agoga used to generate the second style of landing page is broken. Any search query or link click redirects you to the same page you just left, with a nice photo of a mountain range, or other scenery visible in place of the advertisements that should be shown. They are making nothing from this type of landing page; in fact, they are losing money due to bandwidth costs.

Opportunity Missed

I would be willing to bet that the majority of the traffic that Agoga.com receives will end up at the second landing page, the broken one. While they probably have their highest traffic domains such as http://www.google.cm pointing to their ‘working’ script, they are missing out on the whole long-tail of domain misspellings. Think about it this way - any mistake made by anyone anywhere when he misspells .com as .cm will send him to the broken script. This could be anyone typing in one of a billion domains.

Additionally, a fair number of people who misspell the the domains of large sites such as Google will make multiple mistakes - they may mispell google.com as google.cm, but how many are prone to make multiple mistakes such as gogle.cm or googel.cm and be sent to the broken page?

What Are You Trying to Tell Us Here?

The point of what I am trying to say should have become clear by this point, but I will write it out nice and neat anyways: an neglect of details can lose you a lot of money. I do not know if this second landing page has ever actually worked for Agoga. Perhaps it has, and only stopped working 15 minutes before I stumbled upon it the first time. Perhaps it has never worked. The fact of the matter is, the person or persons who own Agoga.com (Whois data indicates Nameview, Inc, BTW) are losing thousands of dollars per day. It is probably safe to assume that they don’t even realize this; if they did, they would fix it in realtively short order.
The people responsible for this had an amazing idea, which they ran with 90% of the way to the perfect money-making opportunity. But they have missed a few small details which are costing them perhaps thousands of dollars per day. If they were to fix these small problems, they could probably nearly double their income.

I appreciate your comments and feedback!

Congratulations, CShel

CShel, a webmaster friend of mine, has noticed some great movement in the Google SERPS for her site about Lafayette, Indiana. She’s been putting a lot of work into the SEO aspects of the site over the last number of months, and it’s great to see that she’s been rewarded for it. Once again, Congratulations, CShel - hope you get number 1!

[TEST] Just to Make Sure…

This post really serves no purpose except as a test to make sure everything is working. I am mostly concerned if my feed redirections and new Technorati claims are ok. Well, this should just about do it.

Possible Blog Downtime Ahead

Good Afternoon.

I just want to give my readers some warning that this weekend I will be moving this blog from it’s current location to http://www.caydel.com. For those that don’t know, Caydel is a nick I use in forums, chats, and is the name I am best known by in the Search world. So, for brandability purposes, and proper SEO purposes, this blog will be moved.

I will be setting up a 301 redirect, so all the links pointing to the current blog should still resolve to the new site, pointing at the correct posts etc. However, I would appreciate it if anyone still linking here would be so kind as to change their links to point at my new location.

Thank you for your patience!

Update: The move is over and done with now - no explosions, and only a few minuted of downtime while I was tinkering with the redirect. Luckily, despite problems, jpeg and noodl at #apache on irc.freenode.net set me straight - Thanks guys!

ReviewMe Launches!

This morning, ReviewMe, a new company run by Andy Hagens and Aaron Wall launched. Similar to some extent to PayPerPost or the upcoming LoudLaunch, ReviewMe is a site that seeks to link companies to bloggers.

The basic idea is this: You log into your account at ReviewMe, and submit your blog. If approved, you will provided a set of products, services or other items to review, with a certain amount of monetary compensation.

It also appears that your blog is listed in a directory on ReviewMe, through which Advertisers can browse. Each blog’s listing contains some statistics about the site, including Alexa Rank, Technorati Rank, an estimated number of RSS subscribers, and an overall ranking out of five stars for the blog. Each blog has a specific price attached to it, for which advertisers may purchase a post on that blog. I hope these rankings are updated often, as this blog seems to fluctuate randomly on each of those statistics. Currently, my Alexa and Technorati rankings are lower than typical.

One slightly disappointing note: While my blog currently carries a price tag of $40 for an advertiser to offer to sponsor a post, the share going to the blogger is only 50%. I would have liked to see ReviewMe follow other programs such as Adbrite or Performancing Partners in that they pay the blogger 70% of the total advertising cost.

Where ReviewMe stands apart from the crowd is it’s focus on full disclosure. In a bid to ethically remain on the white side of the line, they require their bloggers to include a disclosure policy in every post written for ReviewMe. This separates ReviewMe from other services such as PayPerPost where a disclosure is not necessarily required.

Previously, I have spent some time looking at PayPerPost as a way to monetize my blog. Unlike PayPerPost, you are free to express your own opinions about the products and services you mention; there is no pressure for your review to be positive. The view taken by ReviewMe is that the advertiser is paying for a review, not a sponsored praise piece.

ReviewMe seems to hold a lot of potential for the blogosphere. It seems to take on PayPerPost on a higher ethical level. While there no doubt will be some initial resistance by many bloggers on the idea of sponsored posts, this will provide ways both for marketers to get word out about their products, and bloggers to make a little extra money to cover their costs.

P.S. This is a sponsored review. Please note that this post represents my true views on the subject at hand.

« Previous PageNext Page »